John Dwyer, Vermont, 1756
John Dwyer and you will Jacob Blount bound by themselves to invest 50 weight to help you “our Sovering Lord Queen George another his Heirs and you will Successors” on the 30 Could possibly get 1756, from inside the a marriage bond. The responsibility said, “Brand new criteria with the obligations that whereas a marriage is intended ranging from John Dwyer and Jemina Enough time all of so it county away from Tyrrell aforementioned, Virgin woman, Now if there is no lawfull end up in in order to hamper the newest told you relationships, then your more than obligation as gap…” 9
Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785
During the 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and you can Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of City of Philadelphia, joined into a thread because of the following marriage from Joshua Farrell and you may Mary Anne McCartney. ten Although this record is actually theoretically with the the termination of brand new Innovative Combat, will still be a not bad example of the latest colonial point in time securities.
“The state of the responsibility is really, that in case there shall not hereafter arrive people lawful assist otherwise obstacle, of the reason of every kissbrides.com read review Pre-package, Consanguinity, Attraction, and other only Lead to at all, however, that the above-mentioned Joshua Farrell and you may Mary Anne McCartney, get legitimately Wed; and that there’s no Fit depending before any court, for or regarding the any such Pre-contract; and just have when your told you Events, each of them, is of complete Chronilogical age of 21 years old Decades, and tend to be not in University fees off their unique Parents, or have the complete Consent out of his or her Mothers otherwise Guardians respectively into said Relationship; and when it, otherwise sometimes ones, aren’t indented Servants, and perform and you may should save yourself simple and sustain indemnified the above-mentioned John Dickinson Esquire…and you can should on top of that conserve harmless and keep maintaining indemnified the newest Clergyman, Minister, or Individual that will join the told you Events when you look at the Matrimony, getting, or by Reasoning of his thus performing; next it Obligation getting Emptiness and of not one Impact, if not to face in full Push and Advantage.”
Within my look, I have come across numerous relationship securities to possess my personal ancestors and you will lookup victims. That, like, ‘s the relationship off my husband’s next-great-grand-parents, Lewis Tharp and Joanna Western.
Lewis Tharp and you will Joanna Western had been partnered for the Fauquier State, Virginia inside 1805. The only real list one to stays of the matrimony is the bond, with the concur of Joanna’s dad. Because she wasn’t but really twenty-one to, their own father, John West, provided their composed consent. Brand new bondsman try William Western, who had been most likely this new sister regarding Joanna West. 11
George Tharp and Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801
Another bond I discovered whenever contrasting south-west family relations are the wedding bond out of George Tharp and Polly Noland. The bond is actually old twelve January 1801 during the Fauquier County. John Western was the fresh bondsman. 12
I determined there were a couple of contacts between George Tharp and his bondsman, John Western. First, John West is the fresh new bro away from Polly Noland. Polly’s mommy, “Gemime Noland,” offered their unique consent to possess Polly to marry George Tharp, since she was not yet , many years 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland is actually the latest sister off Bathsehba Arnold, who was simply the fresh new wife off John Western. Jemima try widowed by the time Polly try married, that is most likely why cousin John Western is expected to-be the newest bondsman.
The following union ranging from John West and you may George Tharp is that John Western repaid taxation to own George Tharp during the 1799 and you can 1800. 13 This may mean that George Tharp is used by John Western, maybe given that an enthusiastic apprentice otherwise servant. Guys which functioning others was in fact usually accountable for make payment on taxation of these servants or apprentices. 14