This would in fact not be an issue with that it structure; Sir John de Keith d

This would in fact not be an issue with that it structure; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife of Malise

Regarding the Comyn daughter who was simply partner out-of Malise regarding Strathearn, I experienced theorized within the 2005 you to definitely she were Margaret, identified as partner of Sir John de- Keith (see content away from article lower than) who was simply 2ndly age are supplied for the reason that blog post: the https://lovingwomen.org/sv/franska-kvinnor/ new partner Emma I would recommend are of another relatives, and never mommy of 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , says partly, ‘Malise, Earl of Strathearn, got a wife Emma, for the 1261-1267, whoever surname is unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. sometime in advance of 1270, to make certain that their widow (Margaret) might have been “available” sometime once Emma.

This was without a doubt a speculation; it does feel the advantage of working with a known matchmaking ranging from Muriel Keith and you will Reginald ce Cheyne. Any more related documents manage however feel welcome.

The new membership for the Scots Peerage concerning the category of Keith states from Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) that he are thought to has married Comyn, earl regarding Buchan . It identification, of your unsure (“said to was basically”) diversity, is now able to be corrected in accordance with the following the dispensation, dated at Fondi toward 14 The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 With the bishop out-of Moray. Faculty to help you distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, from Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, throughout the obstacle so you can marriage as a result of the 3rd and you will last degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, tomorrow 2nd wife regarding Robert Stewart, initial Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), is contracted so you can marry Reginald le Cheyne, child off Sir Reginald ce Cheyne from the his partner (given that their unique basic spouse), Helen out-of Strathearn. When you’re you will find recognized gaps in the ancestry of Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne perform express a lineage about Comyns. But not, this might be also faraway to require an excellent dispensation if Muriel is a great-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl out of Buchan (d. 1233), which will be the circumstances when the is why daughter.

2. Reginald ce Cheyne was a beneficial-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child from Alexander Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1290), child regarding William Comyn mentioned above. Their particular young buck was Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn out-of 1312 so you’re able to his death in the 1328 , and dad of Reginald.

ca. 1270), was same as Marjory Comyn, and you may hitched 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn (d. 1312). This will mean the parentage a€?thought to enjoys been’ that of Margaret, wife out of Sir John de- Keith, is away from you to definitely generation: she’d not have started new d Comyn, Earl off Buchan, but instead of his son Alexander. There isn’t any research you to definitely Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn had been married far prior to 1275: because the Lindsay had written,

There’s that discernable basis about what the connection ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and Muriel Keith would have stayed: in the event the Margaret Comyn, spouse regarding Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The fresh wife in the earl, on the 1275, is actually named Marjory, even as we understand the attesting condition regarding Zero. curriculum vitae., which can be mentioned by the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. guy. vi., to have been next sister out-of John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, exactly who negotiated on the behalf of Earl Malise the wedding settlement over said [dated at the London, April twenty-six, 1293 to have his daughter Matilda and Robert de Tony, young man out-of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy Elizabeth out of Buchan I __________________I________________ We III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als We E out of Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We We We We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de Keith Elizabeth of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony We ______I_______________________ We We We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Elizabeth out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I ce Cheyne We We We = 2) Sir David I V We I de Graham Sir William de- I I__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I I III I I We We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *